For many clinicians, the moments from the exam room that stay with them are rarely the dramatic ones. They're the avoidable ones: the patient who lands in the emergency department over a weekend because no one caught the warning signs on Thursday, the medication that was never reconciled, the specialist visit that never got back to the person managing the whole picture. None of those failures are about the skill of any single clinician. They're about a system that pays for activity instead of outcomes, and that leaves everyone in it working harder than ever while patients still fall through the gaps.
That is the promise of value-based care: paying for health rather than volume and rewarding clinicians for keeping people well. But value-based primary care has stalled in so many places not because the payment model is wrong. It's that too many have approached it as a contract to manage rather than a system of care to build. Scaling it takes connecting the entire system—primary care, the health plan, in-home care, retail clinics and the neighborhood pharmacy—so that care is organized around one person rather than fragmented across wherever it happens to be delivered. That is what CVS Health is working to build. And it is hard.
Why scaling value-based primary care is hard
We should be clear about the difficulty, because the industry too often isn't. This is a challenging moment for value-based care—and it is challenging industry-wide. Three forces are converging at once: medical costs have risen as patients returned to care after the pandemic; reimbursement has lagged those costs; and the risk-adjustment models that underpin the sustainability of the model have changed. The result is outsized operational and financial pressure on value-based providers.
There is a more fundamental difficulty—one that never shows up in a contract. Value-based primary care only works when you have a panel of patients you know well, and that takes years to build, not quarters. A clinic isn't sustainable the day it opens; it becomes sustainable as relationships deepen, gaps in care close, and avoidable costs come down. We learned this at Oak Street Health. Our footprint grew quickly, and we have since moved from a clinic-growth mentality to a disciplined focus on strengthening performance in existing centers—deepening the panels in the clinics we already have rather than chasing new construction. It’s the less glamorous strategy. It’s also the right one.
In this environment, it is important to be precise about each patient's health needs so that care teams have an accurate picture of the people they serve. That work matters, and it demands rigor in how conditions are identified, documented and addressed. We have invested in AI-enabled tools to help meet that bar. But documentation accuracy is only the starting point. The durable work—the work that actually bends the cost curve—is medical cost management: keeping people out of the hospital, coordinating their specialists, managing their medications, and addressing the social barriers that drive avoidable utilization. That is harder, slower and less visible than administrative precision. It is also the only thing that makes value-based care worth doing.
Doing that at scale takes more than any single clinic or any single contract. In practice, it comes down to four things.
It takes shared accountability, not siloed contracts
Value-based contracts move accountability from the cost of a single service to the total cost of a patient's care: every admission, every specialist, every prescription, and the social factors that shape all of them. Making that work demands genuine alignment between payors and providers, who too often operate at arm's length on competing incentives. Oak Street Health is an all-payor model—built to deliver for every health plan and every patient, not any single relationship. When a health plan and a care team commit to the same goal for the same patient, with appropriate consent and safeguards, they can coordinate more closely, close gaps in care faster, and organize care around the person rather than the claim.
And it is working. At Oak Street Health, which is fully accountable for the total cost of care of the patients it serves, the model produces a 40% reduction in hospital admissions per thousand compared with traditional Medicare. These are not feel-good statistics: when patients stay healthier, every payor that partners with Oak Street benefits—and so do the patients themselves. Aetna is one example of that alignment, and the depth of that collaboration demonstrates what genuine payor-provider alignment can achieve. Oak Street’s model is designed to work across payors, with the same focus on improving outcomes and lowering avoidable costs for every patient it serves.